The latest BBC Complaints Report has just been published. This report can be funnier than many of the sit-coms put out by the BBC.
The Jeremy Hardy one is my favourite, I definitely disagree with shooting BNP voters in the back of the head, between the eyes is much more appropriate.
Material between programmes
CBBC, 6 August 2004
The complaint
A viewer complained about presenters Dick and Dom apparently imitating “flashers” and then appearing almost naked while promoting the return of their weekend series on the channel.
Finding
The behaviour went beyond the kind of unplanned tomfoolery which had been anticipated, and beyond what was appropriate in this context.
Further action
Independently of the Unit’s investigation, the management of CBBC made clear to the presenters and programme team that acceptable limits had been exceeded, and that any elements of improvisation must remain appropriate to the target audience.
Jeremy Hardy Speaks to the Nation
BBC Radio 4, 9 September 2004
The complaint
A large number of people complained that Jeremy Hardy, in the course of one of his comic monologues, suggested shooting BNP voters in the back of the head, and that this was inappropriate.
Finding
Jeremy Hardy was seeking to satirise those on the left who, as he put it, “always have to be positive about humankind and it’s just so tiresome”. However, the singling out of a particular group as a target for the violent alternative he humorously proposed was inappropriate.
Further action
The Commissioning Editor for Radio 4 reminded the producer of the particular care needed in relation to comedy which proceeds from a particular political viewpoint, and the producer has discussed the issue with Jeremy Hardy.
What Not to Wear
BBC One (Scotland), 18 October 2004
The complaint
Two viewers complained that the word “shag” went beyond their expectations, even bearing in mind the presenters’ well-known outspokenness, and should not have been used in a programme transmitted at 7pm.
Finding
The series had originally been commissioned for after the watershed, and was re-edited in the light of its earlier placings. Because of an oversight, the word “shag” escaped the re-editing. In the context, it was inappropriate.
Further action
Independently of the Unit’s investigation, the word was edited out before the programme’s transmission south of the border later in the week.
BBC News
BBC News 24, 23 August 2004
The complaint concerned a report by Julia Caesar on BBC News 24 on 23 August 2004. The item focused on the findings of a survey of investments showing that women averaged a much higher growth for their portfolios than men, or the market as a whole, for a selected period. The complainant claimed that the report caricatured men as being cognitively simple, impatient and having only a shallow understanding of the processes involved. According to the complainant, the report presented gender and racial stereotyping as news. He was particularly offended by the quotation of a comment made by Angela Knight, Chief Executive of the Association of Private Client Investment and Stockbrokers. Ms Knight was quoted as saying that ”women invest with their heads and men invest with testosterone”.
By quoting this comment the complainant considered the report had entered the “field of eugenics” and that such theories equated to “hate crime”. He further claimed that the broadcasting of such material was in violation of the BBC’s Charter.
Recent Comments